The Syrian opposition, early dominated by a young demographic wishing for an "Arab Spring" in their own land, has morphed through various phases - from a militarized but responsible opposition that was essentially starved out by possible Western aid, to the current splintered, radicalized, rebels, dominated by hateful Islamic extremists of various sorts, each in turn supported by regional powers with their own agendas.
Click on image for full picture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a56ce/a56ce99a61622b2678569f81b1a6819daeb020a4" alt=""
Syria's Assad was bolstered early on by steady, robust Russian military and non military aid, as well as forceful intervention by Iran's Hezbollah, coming from Lebanon. Iran and Hezbollah may have their own agendas, ie creating an arc of influence from Iran to the Mediterranean Sea, but in the process, found supporting Assad was part of that calculation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9461b/9461ba5d3012719d447132e7277765cc636c4010" alt=""
Assad's use of chemical weapons in the summer of 2013 was a horrific act and political miscalculation that almost, almost, resulted in a significant Western intervention. But diplomacy "won" the day, resulting in an agreement to remove the chemical weapons arsenal from Syria.
Now, nearly 9 months on, 80-90% of the chemical percursors have been removed, leaving Assad apparently free for the occasional use of basic chlorine gas attacks. Chlorine is an element not under WMD classification, so any negotiations to prevent its use for this horrific specific purpose will be safely stretched out over months, if not years, if at all.
Click on image for full picture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b7a2/7b7a296470d11e70f7c5ae60cd866419ecc17175" alt=""
A multi-year effort to bring a negotiated end to the conflict, led by the US, and artfully opposed by Russia (with Iran and Hezbollah in quiet agreement), has effectively petered out due to the new Russian incursion into Ukraine, where once again the US believes its own negotiating prowess (with virtually no track record to support such faith) will win the day.
Click on image for full picture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/780bc/780bcc4a24a44e2228b621c7994af828d04557ae" alt=""
So, on we go to a Syrian Presidential election set for June. As the BBC article puts it, "The pressures on Mr Assad are now so light that he is preparing to have himself re-elected for another full seven-year term, rather than opting for a compromise two-year extension, an idea kicked around a few months ago when diplomacy was active."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/424c9/424c9d85b06e3e42702ccee6c1af1c6e4cede5b6" alt=""
Want to bet on who will win?
2 comments:
For a sobering viewpoint on Assad's Syria, try this: Inhumanity and the Moral Limit in Syria. http://middleeastvoices.voanews.com/2014/03/voices-inhumanity-and-the-moral-limit-in-syria-45684/?from=mevlister
"That is not how-- international-- law and international norms are observed in the 21st century." And yet...apparently that IS the norm in the 21st century!
Post a Comment